Skip to content
Home » Negligent Security Cases, Cox v. Keg Restaurant: Protect your Company with Central Insurance Agency

Negligent Security Cases, Cox v. Keg Restaurant: Protect your Company with Central Insurance Agency

SQUARE CIA INTERNAL IMAGES (41).png

Information sourced from Negligent Security Attorney

The security industry has experienced a number of recent changes, including an increased need for guards. With this growth comes increased risks— it’s important to make sure you are protecting your business and your security employees from potential threats. Central Insurance Agency is prepared to provide you with a custom insurance solution to fit your needs.

The majority of negligent security lawsuits involve assault and battery crimes (42%), followed by sex assault and rape claims (26%); wrongful death (15%), robbery (9%) and lastly, false imprisonment (4%). The remaining percentage (4%) falls into a miscellaneous category, including such as arson, home invasions, and carjacking.

In Cox v. Keg Restaurant, Washington Appeals Court, 1997, Bar manager James Kollasch was warned that a drunken customer named Philip Whalen posed a threat to other patrons. 

The manager bounced Whalen from the bar, but Whalen re-entered the bar not long thereafter. After being in the bar for some time, Whalen brutally attacked Cox, another patron. The negligent security bar fight resulted in the Plaintiff suffering significant brain injury. 

The Plaintiff, Cox, sued the Keg Restaurant, claiming that they were negligent in failing to remove the dangerous patron. However, the Court ruled that the bar was not responsible for Whalen’s vicious attack.

Covering your security agency with a custom insurance plan in unprecedented circumstances like the above case is imperative to protecting your business and your employees. Central Insurance Agency can provide you with the protection and materials you need to ensure the continued success of your company. Contact us today for a free quote!

%d bloggers like this: