Skip to content
Home » Negligent Security Cases, Doe v. Kmart Corp: Protect your Company with Central Insurance Agency

Negligent Security Cases, Doe v. Kmart Corp: Protect your Company with Central Insurance Agency

security camera

Information sourced from Negligent Security Attorney

The security industry has experienced a number of recent changes, including an increased need for guards. With this growth comes increased risks— it’s important to make sure you are protecting your business and your security employees from potential threats. Central Insurance Agency is prepared to provide you with a custom insurance solution to fit your needs.

The majority of negligent security lawsuits involve assault and battery crimes (42%), followed by sex assault and rape claims (26%); wrongful death (15%), robbery (9%) and lastly, false imprisonment (4%). The remaining percentage (4%) falls into a miscellaneous category, including such as arson, home invasions, and carjacking.

In Doe v. Kmart Corp, 1997 South Carolina, a female victim, leaving an area K-Mart, was abducted and raped in a desolate area for a full day (24 hours). The female victim, Doe, brought suit against the Kmart store. 

The inadequate security lawsuit alleged that, due to the high crime in the area, the store did not do anything to prevent foreseeable criminal attacks on its patron in its parking lot. The trial evidence revealed that a very similar kidnapping and assault attack occurred in the same parking lot and the store still did nothing. 

The jury found in favor of the Plaintiff and found the female rape victims damages as $600,000.

Covering your security agency with a custom insurance plan in unprecedented circumstances like the above case is imperative to protecting your business and your employees. Central Insurance Agency can provide you with the protection and materials you need to ensure the continued success of your company. Contact us today for a free quote!

%d bloggers like this: