Skip to content
Home » Negligent Security Cases, McCann v. Grant: Protect your Company with Central Insurance Agency

Negligent Security Cases, McCann v. Grant: Protect your Company with Central Insurance Agency

security office

Information sourced from Negligent Security Attorney

The security industry has experienced a number of recent changes, including an increased need for guards. With this growth comes increased risks— it’s important to make sure you are protecting your business and your security employees from potential threats. Central Insurance Agency is prepared to provide you with a custom insurance solution to fit your needs.

The majority of negligent security lawsuits involve assault and battery crimes (42%), followed by sex assault and rape claims (26%); wrongful death (15%), robbery (9%) and lastly, false imprisonment (4%). The remaining percentage (4%) falls into a miscellaneous category, including such as arson, home invasions, and carjacking.

In McCann v. Grant, Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, Ohio, 1999, a nurse reporting to the hospital was raped in the parking lot of the hospital. The nurse sued the hospital, claiming negligent security.

Specifically, the plaintiff attorney alleged the hospital provided no perimeter security, no lot attendant, and no security guards, and inadequate monitoring of CCTV cameras, despite knowing that crime takes place in this hospital parking lot.

A jury of 6 agreed with the Plaintiff and awarded her $400,000.Covering your security agency with a custom insurance plan in unprecedented circumstances like the above case is imperative to protecting your business and your employees. Central Insurance Agency can provide you with the protection and materials you need to ensure the continued success of your company. Contact us today for a free quote!

%d bloggers like this: